For the love of god.
First of all, I don't know where either of you got the idea that you were the most hated posters. As far as flame mail received, neither of you would be considered the most hated, so go to hell.
Now.. in terms of these so called "rules".. they are not fucking rules. No posts are censored (except for the use of real names). No posts are deleted either or blocked unless there are exceptional circusmstances.
I have been avoiding naming who the culprits are of the shit-tastic posts. Calliander and Gatekeeper, you two are not the intended targets. Gatekeeper, I don't believe any of your posts have been marked down in rating and Calliander has had one or two marked down.
All post subjects will be listed in a column on the left, regardless of quality.
If the two of you are going to continue shouting shit saying how the site has gone to hell and that you're going to leave.. then fine.. I really don't care. I am not going to beg you to stay, so don't expect that. You're the morons leaving for no reason.
I really don't understand how this notion of most hated poster has become so strong. All I mentioned was that people were going to vote on who they hate more and I listed the candidates that are expected to have votes. Being most hated will not affect your default quality rating necessarily. If you're hated because of all of your low quality posts, then thats another matter.
If you are hated because of things you say against groups of people (women, races, religion, etc) then you should wear the crown of hatred with honour.
I am going to continue to mark down posts I see as horrible. If a post is not a rant, has no substance, and is a waste of everyone's time reading.. then I will mark it down. If you are offended by that, continue to be offended.. it's not personal yet, it's just you don't write anything interesting.
Look at the statistics.. if you are on the top 10, it means that you can write a quality post. If your % of characters written is lower than the % of posts.. you probably have a low ranking and you haven't been writing quality posts.
The problem is mainly with the authors added since August. Read some of the older rants. The authors who were writing back in April/May last year (Wilson, Stone, Preacherman to name a few) have brought up the fact that the site sucks now because of all the shit that goes onto the main page. I totally agree with them.
I am sick of one line posts. Either rant correctly, or shut the fuck up. I want something good to read, not some short shitty post. The only time your post should have very few words is if you are posting a cool image (like FlyingTim has been doing). If you feel like you have a response to the image, when you reply you better have a full rant.. not a one liner saying you agree/disagree.
Lick me